Wednesday, January 25, 2006

Blue Like Jazz Blues

I love 9 Marks Ministries. Let me say it again. I love it. Mark Dever's work has tremendously blessed the church. We are using his materials, and we will continue to do so. I love 9 Marks of a Healthy Church and The Deliberate Church. I can't say enough good things about Dever and his work. I even had him in a class at Southern. He's as real as they get.

However, I hated the recent review on their site of Donald Miller's book, Blue Like Jazz. You can read it here. Miller is a part of the Imago Dei Community, a part of the Acts 29 Network, founded by Mark Driscoll. The churches of this movement are profoundly God-centered, gospel-focused, and word-driven. For example, try to find a flaw in Mark Driscoll's Mars Hill Church. People there (and in most Acts 29 churches) are getting way more Bible than in 98% of SBC churches across America. Driscoll preaches hour-long expositional messages every week there, largely to young men-- a group in the Northwest seen as unreachable by most evangelicals. Now, I know that Driscoll didn't write Blue Like Jazz. Miller isn't in his church. I'm just saying that Donald Miller isn't necessarily Brian McLaren. He's in a movement of God-centered, gospel preaching churches. So, just because a guy uses modern slang, preaches in a t-shirt, and listens to U2, it doesn't mean he's a religious relativist who hates propositional truth. So, my point is this: we need to educate ourselves before we throw stones. Perhaps those toward whom we hurl things are our friends more than we realize.

However, the author of the review doesn't mention any of this. He just hates the book. Let me say, this isn't my favorite book. But I like it. It is just Miller's attempt to share his religious pilgrimage. It isn't complete. Things are left out. This makes people nervous. But if you sit down with a person and say, "Tell me about your relationship with Jesus," he's going to leave some things out. If you respond by saying, "Well, Miller should have been more responsible, as millions of people are reading and are being influenced by the book," I say this: praise the Lord God that not everybody is just like me, thinking in bland, linear, bullet-points. Thank Jesus that everybody out there is not a theological blockhead like myself. Thank God that there are believers out there who are artists, painting strokes that aren't necessarily neat and pretty, yet reflect the beauty of God. Miller's book is like that. If it were a concise Wayne Grudem, nobody would be reading it. But it's not heresy either. It just smells "emergent." It questions the dominant evangelical Christian subculture (how could a Christian be opposed to the war?). This makes people nervous.

Rich Mullins once said that young songwriters typically attempt to say everything they believe in one song. I, for one, am thankful that there are Donald Millers out there. There are enough uptight people out there. Thankfully, not everybody's brain is heavy to the left. This book isn't the enemy. 9 Marks, keep fighting. We need you. Just look before you throw.

Saturday, January 21, 2006

Open Theist to Speak at Columbia Church

Columbia's Woodcrest Chapel is having author and pastor Greg Boyd speak at her Sunday morning services. For those of you unfamiliar with Boyd, he has debated for the last several years with John Piper regarding "open theism" or "openness theology." Boyd argues that God is often ignorant about the future (lacks simple foreknowledge). Piper has opposed that view and has argued to keep the teaching out of the denomination of the two men (Baptist General Conference).

Boyd's favorite illustration is to speak of a young girl called to missions who marries another man who senses the same vocation from God. They go on the mission field together. They don't live happily ever after, however. The man (I think while on furlough) ends up having an affair and leaving his wife. When the distraught young lady heads to Boyd for counsel, he responds with this: God is just as surprised and grieved as you are.

Boyd argues that historic Arminianism fails miserably in explaining God's providence. First, he argues, what is the ontological grounding of God's foreknowledge? If I haven't made decisions yet-- if those choices aren't acted out-- then how can they be known? Second, Boyd asks, doesn't God having simple foreknowledge render things just as fixed as in a Calvinistic system? If he foreknows it, it is gonna happen, right? Third, if God does have simple foreknowledge, then how is that of providential benefit? As an illustration, if you know that next year you're business is going to crash and you're going to lose everything, does that really help you? The answer is no. Boyd takes these arguments, props them up with some questionable proof-texts, and proclaims God's "openness" (meaning the future is open for God, as well).

Boyd gives a stirring rebuke to historic Arminian understandings of providence. His point is that historic Arminianism leaves things just as determined as Calvinism. He has some valid points in that regard. His problem is that he butchers Scripture in the process. For example, much of the book of Isaiah serves to show how, unlike the un-gods, the God of the Bible knows the future.

Isa 46:9 Remember the former things, those of long ago; I am God, and there is no other; I am God, and there is none like me. 10 I make known the end from the beginning, from ancient times, what is still to come. I say: My purpose will stand, and I will do all that I please. 11 From the east I summon a bird of prey; from a far-off land, a man to fulfill my purpose. What I have said, that will I bring about; what I have planned, that will I do.

God knows the future, because He plans the future. That is why the historic Reformed understanding of providence makes the most sense biblically. Boyd tries to rescue people from historic Arminian or Calvinist concepts of God, yet He clearly denies the God of the Bible. And He robs people of the comfort that comes from that God. Of what comfort is it to someone to say, "I know that guy left you, but God's just as clueless as you are"? How he argues that such teaching has pastoral benefit baffles me.

It is troubling that Woodcrest has invited him to speak (for at least the second time). If the church's pastors do not endorse open theism (doubtful), then they risk exposing them to a man who does. Boyd has denied the historic, biblical understanding of God. That is a serious problem.

For more reading on this issue, I suggest these articles by John Piper:

Pastoral Implications of Greg Boyd's View in Dealing with Suffering
Answering Greg Boyd's Openness of God Texts
The Enormous Ignorance of God
Is the Glory of God at Stake in God's Foreknowledge of Human Choices?
Does God Make Mistakes?

In addition, I commend these books to you from a trusted former professor and elder of mine.

Ware, Bruce. God's Lesser Glory: The Diminished God of Open Theism
Ware, Bruce. Their God Is Too Small: Open Theism and the Undermining of Confidence in God.

Friday, January 13, 2006

Driscoll Now Blogging

Mark Driscoll of Seattle's Mars Hill Church is now blogging. Check it out!

I recommend www.bloglines.com to you. You can keep track of Driscoll's blog, as well as mine. You can download a plug-in for Explorer's bookmarks that allows you to subscribe instantly to a blog. Also consider these (search for these titles in bloglines):


Reformissionary
Tasting Life Twice
Worship Matters
Reformed Baptist Thinker
Moore to the Point
Albert Mohler's Blog
Albert Mohler's Commentary
An Infant in a Cradle
Between Two Worlds
Providential Musings
Reformation 21
Founders Ministries Blog

Monday, January 09, 2006

Be Patient, Brothers and Sisters

I love this post from Doug Wilson's weblog. God's timing is often not our timing. Brothers and sisters, God is working on you (and me). Be patient. Trust Him.

Saturday, January 07, 2006

An Open Letter Regarding Israel

Pat Robertson's latest moronic comments make reading this letter important.

Monday, January 02, 2006

Dr. Mohler on Worldviews

Dr. Albert Mohler is beginning a series of articles on "Worldviews at Work." Here is the first post. I will try to post these on this blog whenever I see them. How someone could find joy from being part of the "riot of nature," I don't know.

Sunday, January 01, 2006

Help Uganda

I was appalled when I read this recent Christianity Today article about the awful state of affairs in Uganda. I have already emailed my congressmen and senators (and I never do that). We can't be silent. Read about it here.