Sunday, August 27, 2006

Albert Mohler on Theological Triage

I've shared with our Grace Church crowd some about Dr. Mohler's approach to viewing cooperation between churches and denominations. He writes here about what he calls "theological triage."

Renaming the Trinity?

The Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) has recently discussed whether or not the persons of the Trinity could rightly go by other names. Somebody (besides me and God) doesn't like that idea? Read here.

Tattoos: Mainstream?

Read this post from Aaron Menikoff of 3rd Church in Louisville. I have nothing against tattoos. I kinda think they're cool. But that says quite a lot more than I might have thought.

Thursday, August 24, 2006

Bunches of Babies and Those Who Breed Them

Check out this fabulous article from Christianity Today arguing for large families. In addition, Dr. Mohler discusses it on his broadcast found here (by the way, I highly recommend subscribing to his podcast).

Grace Church will not be a place where people are legalistically manipulated into having large families. However, I want it to be a place where large families are embraced and are seen as normal. I want it to be a place where they are encouraged. Let us not have our values shaped by the world, but let us, as the church, transform things.

P.S. Every time I hear a whiny Christian conservative complaining about an election's results, I want to tell him to look at his 1.8 children and slap himself.

Monday, August 21, 2006

Driscoll on Denominations and Liberalism

Mark Driscoll comments here on the current state of mainline denominations in America. Imagine Bruce Willis as a pastor kickin' his enemies around.

Brad Already in the NFL Endzone

We're proud of Brad Smith here in Tigerland. He's already scored a wild touchdown in the preseason for the NY Jets. Check it out here on YouTube.

Tuesday, August 15, 2006

Dever on Inflated Church Rolls

Mark Dever shares some super thoughts here about why we shouldn't allow our church rolls to become inflated, exceeding the number of persons actually attending. This is so wise. It's disappointing that the SBC resists such wisdom.

"Loving Like Our Father Through the Gospel of Grace"

Loving Like Our Father Through the Gospel of Grace
Matthew 5:43-48, 8/13/06, Kevin P. Larson, Grace Church of Columbia

Some of you may remember the lyrics of an old song that found its roots in the “Jesus Movement” of the 60s and 70s. It goes, “They will know we are Christians by our love, by our love. They will know we are Christians by our love.”

My question we begin with today is this: would Columbians say that Christians are known for their love? Would they say something like this: “See a group of people showing love to others and they must be Christians”?

I don’t think they would. Grab a random non-Christian on the streets of the District, and I think he might say something like this: “On the surface, they love each other, but I’m not even sure that’s the truth. If they do love each other, they certainly don’t love people that aren’t like them. They hate those that don’t agree with them, that don’t look just the same as them. I wouldn’t be surprised if they even prayed that God would judge us and send us to hell right now. They like the people in their little club, but they don’t care for any of us on the outside. When I read the Bible, they don’t look anything like the loving God I see there. Christians aren’t known for love; they’re known for hate.”

Does this hit home? Am I far from the truth? Of course, this response is partially a product of the pluralistic, postmodern society we live in. All ways lead to God. Truth is relative. To say that you know the way or the truth is arrogant and intolerant. So, in a sense, we are often misunderstood. If we say we’re against gay marriage, we’re accused of hate crimes. If we say that Buddhism is a false religion, we’re called hate mongers.

But hasn’t this attitude been reinforced by so-called Christian behavior? People turn on the TV and see some wacko saying that 9-11 was a judgment on America’s sin. They turn on FOX News and see Kansas “minister” Fred Phelps picketing the funerals of homosexuals and soldiers. They walk down Ninth Street and get broad-sided by somebody with the Ten Commandments. They walk through speaker’s circle and hear somebody say, “You whore! You pervert! You’re going to hell.” It’s no wonder you see bumper-stickers that say, “Hate is not a family value.”

It reminds me of the recent arrest of Mel Gibson. This man who was accused of making an anti-Semitic film, The Passion of the Christ, which only cast the Jews as the Bible casts them, was pulled over for driving drunk and proceeded to spew out hateful slurs against Jews. This is how, I’m afraid, unbelievers see us. We hate those that disagree with us.

How the world views us is exactly how Jesus views the Pharisees in today’s passage. We love our own, and hate those on the outside, they say. We don’t look anything like the God we say we worship. That is the way of the Pharisee.

What we need to show them, however, is the way of Jesus. We will see that in this passage. But within this passage, we also see the way of the pagan. Not only do we have the challenge of showing how we differ from the Pharisee through the gospel, the way of Jesus. But we must also show them how we differ from the way of the pagan, the unbeliever. The only way we can do this is by being gripped and changed by the amazing gospel of grace. Then we can impact our city with power.

Let’s read our passage for this morning. Turn with me to Matthew 5:43-48.

Matthew 5:43 "You have heard that it was said, 'You shall love your neighbor and hate your enemy.' 44 But I say to you, Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, 45 so that you may be sons of your Father who is in heaven. For he makes his sun rise on the evil and on the good, and sends rain on the just and on the unjust. 46 For if you love those who love you, what reward do you have? Do not even the tax collectors do the same? 47 And if you greet only your brothers, what more are you doing than others? Do not even the Gentiles do the same? 48 You therefore must be perfect, as your heavenly Father is perfect.

Last week, we looked at Jesus’s teaching that those transformed by grace forgo personal retaliation. Instead of responding with justice, they respond with mercy. This week Jesus goes beyond even that. Not only are we called not to fight back against those we might call our enemies, but we are also called to love them.

I want you to see three things as we move through this passage this morning. First, we’ll look at the teaching of the Pharisees. Second, we’ll consider the teaching of Jesus. Third, we’ll talk about the calling to perfection, which is also, of course, a teaching of our Lord.

First, what was the teaching of the Pharisees? We see this in verse 43 of chapter 5. Jesus says, "You have heard that it was said, 'You shall love your neighbor and hate your enemy.'” You probably wonder, “How the heck did they get that? Hate your enemy!? Good question! As we have worked our way through this section, chapter 5 and verses 21-48, we have seen a progression in the messed up way that the Pharisees saw the Bible. The first two weeks, regarding murder and adultery, we saw that they got the command right, but they didn’t get to the heart of it. Then we saw that they were using a law God gave to regulate divorce to justify unrestrained divorce and remarriage. The next week, we saw how they used God’s commands to guard truth—to keep oaths made in His name—as a way to get around the truth by swearing by other things.
Last week, we saw how the Pharisees were using a verse designed to limit personal revenge as a proof-text for exactly that—“an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth.” This week, we see the Pharisees had gone so far as to use the law to teach the exact opposite of what it said. They were actually teaching and practicing, “You shall love your neighbor and hate your enemy.”

How did they get to that point? The first thing we need to remember is, like I said last week, we have sinful hearts that want to justify themselves. Not only do we naturally want to sin, but we want to make excuses for it. So we have to look at this passage humbly thinking, “How do I try to prop up my sin?” The Pharisees were doing that; they were just bold enough to use the Bible itself to do it.

How, then, were they getting their Bibles to teach, “Hate your enemy”? All of this is speculation, but let me offer some ideas. Leviticus 19:18 says, “You shall not take vengeance or bear a grudge against the sons of your own people, but you shall love your neighbor as yourself. I am the LORD.” Nowhere does it say, “Hate your enemy.” First, they probably took the command to love their neighbor as exclusive. In other words, it meant, “love only your neighbor.” They accented the sentence this way: “love your NEIGHBOR.”

Second, they may have said that the command to “love your neighbor” meant that the opposite was true. In other words, if you are to love neighbors, it follows that you should hate enemies.

Third, they likely interpreted this command as referring only to Jews. The verse I just read, verse 18, speaks of not being vengeful or grudging against the “sons of your own people.” In addition, this section, in Leviticus 19:2, begins with God saying to Moses, “Speak to all the congregation of the people of Israel and say to them…” The command to “love your neighbor” is talking about Jews, they reasoned. Therefore, hating non-Jews must be O.K. or even required.

Fourth, they might have appealed to the conquests of Canaan in support of their hatred. “Hey, Joshua went in with his armies and wiped out all those vile pagans. Now those pagans are ruling our country!” You can see, I’m sure, how one could jump easily to thinking, “Hey, if God said it was O.K. to kill them all back then, surely it’s ok to simply hate them now.”

Fifth, they might have quoted what have been called the imprecatory Psalms. To imprecate means to curse or call down evil on something or someone. These are the Psalms that you want to pray to God about your girlfriend after she dumps you on your head, but shouldn’t. Psalm 58 is an example. It reads,

Psalm 58:1 Do you indeed decree what is right, you gods? Do you judge the children of man uprightly? 2 No, in your hearts you devise wrongs; your hands deal out violence on earth. 3 The wicked are estranged from the womb; they go astray from birth, speaking lies. 4 They have venom like the venom of a serpent, like the deaf adder that stops its ear, 5 so that it does not hear the voice of charmers or of the cunning enchanter. 6 O God, break the teeth in their mouths; tear out the fangs of the young lions, O LORD! 7 Let them vanish like water that runs away; when he aims his arrows, let them be blunted. 8 Let them be like the snail that dissolves into slime, like the stillborn child who never sees the sun. 9 Sooner than your pots can feel the heat of thorns, whether green or ablaze, may he sweep them away! 10 The righteous will rejoice when he sees the vengeance; he will bathe his feet in the blood of the wicked. 11 Mankind will say, "Surely there is a reward for the righteous; surely there is a God who judges on earth."

It’s not hard to see how you could reason, “If our great king David hated his enemies and cursed them, even in the Bible, how much more can we hate those blankety-blanks.”

It’s not hard, then, to see how they might get to “hate your enemy,” but it’s obvious that isn’t the biblical teaching, right? How then should we answer them?

The great Charles Spurgeon called this idea a “parasitical growth” on God’s law. Yes, something foreign to God’s word had attached like a tick and sucked the life out of it. “Hate your enemy?” Some would say, “I see how he gets this. After all, the Old Testament is all about holiness and judgment, and the New Testament is where you see love and grace.” Is that true? Well, of course not.

First, the Pharisees’ sin was so deep and entrenched that they couldn’t see even what was on the same page. As a man, I’m notorious for yelling at Amy from the other room, “Amy’s where’s the Advil?!” I get really frustrated. Amy comes and points and it’s literally right in front of my nose. Well, the Pharisees were teaching to hate your enemies from Leviticus 19:18 when the opposite was taught right in front of their nose!

Listen to Leviticus 19:9-10.

Leviticus 19:9 "When you reap the harvest of your land, you shall not reap your field right up to its edge, neither shall you gather the gleanings after your harvest. 10 And you shall not strip your vineyard bare, neither shall you gather the fallen grapes of your vineyard. You shall leave them for the poor and for the sojourner: I am the LORD your God.

In other words, don’t hate the poor foreigner in your midst. Love him enough that you don’t go back to your vineyard or field and pick up all the stuff that falls off. Leave it for him.

Look also at verses 33-34 of the same chapter.

Leviticus 19:33 "When a stranger sojourns with you in your land, you shall not do him wrong. 34 You shall treat the stranger who sojourns with you as the native among you, and you shall love him as yourself, for you were strangers in the land of Egypt: I am the LORD your God.
Again, the Pharisees were likely reasoning that the command to love your neighbor includes only the people of Israel. But this passage, just down a few verses, teaches that one is to love the sojourner, the non-Jew. God says, “You were once a foreigner in Egypt. You know how it feels. Love him, too.”

Second, John Stott points out that, according to the law, one was to treat the sojourner, or enemy, in almost precisely the same way as the native Jew. For example, turn to Exodus 23:4-5.

Exodus 23:4 "If you meet your enemy's ox or his donkey going astray, you shall bring it back to him. 5 If you see the donkey of one who hates you lying down under its burden, you shall refrain from leaving him with it; you shall rescue it with him.

Now look at Deuteronomy 22:1-4.

Deuteronomy 22:1 "You shall not see your brother's ox or his sheep going astray and ignore them. You shall take them back to your brother. 2 And if he does not live near you and you do not know who he is, you shall bring it home to your house, and it shall stay with you until your brother seeks it. Then you shall restore it to him. 3 And you shall do the same with his donkey or with his garment, or with any lost thing of your brother's, which he loses and you find; you may not ignore it. 4 You shall not see your brother's donkey or his ox fallen down by the way and ignore them. You shall help him to lift them up again.

Notice how similar the two commands are. Enemy or neighbor, the action required is the same. Love him by rescuing his ox or donkey.

Third, the Pharisees again would have known Proverbs 25:21, which Paul, a converted Pharisees, quotes in Romans 12:20. It reads, “If your enemy is hungry, give him bread to eat, and if he is thirsty, give him water to drink.” You certainly weren’t called to hate him.

Fourth, regarding the conquests of Israel, they were one-time points in redemptive history, where God, to protect his people from idolatry, wiped out people in the land he was preparing for His own. God gave them that land. They forfeited it, because they then hooked up with idols anyway. No more such conquests would happen again, because land wouldn’t be given to his people again. That land pointed forward to the New Heavens and New Earth, and that is our hope today. Now our battles are not against flesh and blood, but are spiritual ones.

Sadly, it’s by modern evangelical leaders viewing America as “the land” that some of this ridiculous, hateful speech happens today. They like to look as unbelieving Americans as Canaanites, people that we’re against, people with whom we’re fighting for “the land.” That’s ridiculous. The Pharisees couldn’t appeal to the conquests for an excuse to hate, and neither can we.

Fifth, regarding the imprecatory Psalms, David speaks there as the representative king of Israel who is calling down curses on God’s enemies. He is pleading for God’s justice upon those who curse God and His people. Those statements aren’t designed for individuals, and especially not those in the New Covenant era. We are called, as we shall see, to love our enemies.

So, in review, the idea that hatred for enemies is taught in the Old Testament is ridiculous. The immediate context of Leviticus 19:18 teaches love for enemies. So does the broader teaching of the Old Testament. Once again, the Pharisees were twisting God’s law. The law intended to restrain hatred was being used to justify it. Notice also that they left out the words “as yourself.” Not only were they to love their neighbors. They were to treat them as they would themselves. They had taken a very high standard of God and dumbed it down considerably. They were teachers that were hating their enemies, and they were teaching their students to do the same.

Second, what is the teaching of Jesus? Jesus says, in Matthew 5:20, that those transformed by grace must exceed the so-called righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees. Jesus, the one to whom the Law points, the only one qualified to authoritatively interpret it, takes us again deeper, into the realm of the heart in verses 44-47. He says, once again, this:

Matthew 5:44 But I say to you, Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, 45 so that you may be sons of your Father who is in heaven. For he makes his sun rise on the evil and on the good, and sends rain on the just and on the unjust. 46 For if you love those who love you, what reward do you have? Do not even the tax collectors do the same? 47 And if you greet only your brothers, what more are you doing than others? Do not even the Gentiles do the same?

It’s not enough to not retaliate, as we saw last week. Even then, we saw that we are to extend mercy, giving freely to those who ask. Here, however, Jesus makes that idea even more explicit. Not fighting back isn’t enough. That is passive. What Jesus wants is active. He wants us to love and pray for those we would call enemies.

Let us take each of those two words in turn—“love” and “enemies.” First, love is not limited to activity. It certainly is more than sentiment. It’s action. As James says, in 2:16, if we desire for someone to “warm and filled,” but we do nothing, that’s not love that evidences true faith. Loving our enemies means doing good to them. It’s as we read earlier, which Romans 12:20 quotes—feeding him if he’s hungry, and giving him drink if he’s thirsty. Love involves action.

But love is also more than action. In 1 Corinthians 13:3, Paul says, “If I give away all I have, and if I deliver up my body to be burned, but have not love, I gain nothing.”

One can certainly do actions—give to the poor and submit to martyrdom—and not truly love. One can feasibly do things on the outside that don’t reflect the inside. As we’ll see, in chapter 6, this is what the Pharisees were highly skilled at. No, true love includes emotion. Being “patient and kind,” choosing not to “envy or boast,” not being “arrogant or rude,” not insisting on its “own way,” not being “irritable or resentful” or rejoicing in “wrongdoing,” along with bearing, believing, hoping, and enduring all things—everything found here in our famous 1 Corinthians 13 passage—these are all matters of the heart and not just the hands. Love involves both action and emotion.

Second, love is not qualified by lovability. Obviously, if these people are our enemies, it’s assumed that it won’t be the easiest to love them emotionally. They are our enemies. If we wait for people to be lovable before we love them, we never will.

Third, love is not preceded by charity. Again, if these people are our enemies, we should not expect them to love us before we love them. If we wait for them to love us first, then we’ll never get to loving them.

Fourth, love is not contingent upon reciprocity. If these people are our enemies, we shouldn’t expect them to return our love with love. We don’t care for them expecting anything in return. If we wait until the point when that is guaranteed, we will never love.

Therefore, this love Jesus speaks of is deep and rich and truly divine. We are not just called to love—we are called to love our enemies. And that takes the love required so much deeper. It’s easy to love those that love us, as we’ll see. It’s hard to love people from the heart that aren’t that likeable, who don’t love us first, and who probably never will. But that’s what enemies are like. The point: we are to love those that hate us.

Let’s next look at this word “enemies.” We’ve already considered it a bit, discussing what sort of love is required to love them. To go further, let us look at Jesus’s famous teaching about the Good Samaritan. Turn with me to Luke 10:25-37.

Luke 10:25 And behold, a lawyer stood up to put him to the test, saying, "Teacher, what shall I do to inherit eternal life?" 26 He said to him, "What is written in the Law? How do you read it?" 27 And he answered, "You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your strength and with all your mind, and your neighbor as yourself."
28 And he said to him, "You have answered correctly; do this, and you will live." 29 But he, desiring to justify himself, said to Jesus, "And who is my neighbor?" 30 Jesus replied, "A man was going down from Jerusalem to Jericho, and he fell among robbers, who stripped him and beat him and departed, leaving him half dead. 31 Now by chance a priest was going down that road, and when he saw him he passed by on the other side. 32 So likewise a Levite, when he came to the place and saw him, passed by on the other side. 33 But a Samaritan, as he journeyed, came to where he was, and when he saw him, he had compassion. 34 He went to him and bound up his wounds, pouring on oil and wine. Then he set him on his own animal and brought him to an inn and took care of him. 35 And the next day he took out two denarii and gave them to the innkeeper, saying, 'Take care of him, and whatever more you spend, I will repay you when I come back.' 36 Which of these three, do you think, proved to be a neighbor to the man who fell among the robbers?" 37 He said, "The one who showed him mercy." And Jesus said to him, "You go, and do likewise."

We see here a beautiful expression of love. We see action. The man helped the robbed man, bandaging up his wounds, carrying him to a hotel, giving him further care, and even picking up the tab.

We also see emotion. Verse 33 says that, “when he saw him, he had compassion.” Both his hands and his heart were engaged simultaneously.

But we can’t neglect something very significant about this passage. Jews and Samaritans were the worst of enemies! Samaritans again were known as half-breeds by the Jews. They came about from the intermarrying of Gentiles and Jews during the time of captivity. They had their own Bible—which only included the first five books. They had their own places of worship—which we know from the Old Testament was a big “no-no.” Jews hated them.

Think of how the story could have been told differently. Jesus could have told the story so that the Jew was the hero rescuing the poor Samaritan. That would have been counter-cultural. But Jesus makes the Jews the bad guys. They pass by the man on their way to their religious duties. And He makes the Samaritan the hero. Jesus makes it so that the young lawyer can identify with the victim, not the godly rescuer. Christ doesn’t even say, “Who was the neighbor that was loved?” He says, “Who ‘proved to be a neighbor to the man’”? Jesus’s story is so counter-cultural, that the man, instead of saying, “the Samaritan,” can’t even utter his name. He says, “The one who showed him mercy.”

What’s our point here? The lawyer quoted the verse we began with this morning—Leviticus 19:18—which reads, “Love your neighbor as yourself.” Jesus then shows what that means. Our neighbor is anyone in need, including our enemy. We are to love him or her, from the heart, in tangible, physical ways. This includes people that are not lovable, that don’t love us first, that won’t love us back—our enemies.

Now I don’t want to do this often, but pause for a second, close your eyes, and picture someone who right now might be called your enemy.
Jesus, however, takes us even beyond this. Listen again to verse 44. Jesus says, “Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you.” He specifically here mentions persecutors. This hearkens back to Matthew 5:10-12 where Jesus says that those who are persecuted are blessed and should rejoice. Here Christ says that He wants those blessed, persecuted souls to pray for their persecutors. As we minister here in the District, we will no doubt, just by proclaiming truth, create enemies who become persecutors. Not only are we to love them. We are to pray for them.

Jesus modeled this, as you will remember. As recorded in Luke 23:34, Christ, while hanging on the cross, cried out to His Father, saying, “Father, forgive them, for they do not know what they do.”

But this certainly applies broader than simply those who persecute us for our faith. It includes all those that stand opposed to us, with whom we do not see eye to eye. God commands us to pray for them.

This week, Amy and I are going to take a bit of a vacation. We will be traveling to Bloomington, Indiana to see my sister Krystal and her family. We are very much looking forward to it, but three or four years ago, this never would have happened. See, Amy wasn’t too fond of Krystal then. And, when you’re married, it’s not too much fun when your wife doesn’t like your sister. Women, you see, are pretty territorial about their men. They don’t want some other girl telling him what to do or demanding his attention. So problems often ensue.

Anyway, Amy didn’t like her at all. Family gatherings were always very awkward. And it caused a lot of tension between Amy and me. My wife, however, began praying for Krystal. She began asking God to bless her. She began asking God to help her love her. God did some amazing things in Amy’s heart. The two reconciled. And now Amy enjoys seeing Krystal.

As D.A. Carson notes, one way we show our love for our enemies is by praying for them. He writes, “Praying for an enemy and loving him will prove mutually reinforcing. The more love, the more prayer; the more prayer, the more love.”

Do we want to love our enemies? Let us love them by praying for them. Let us pray for them that we might love them more.

John Stott writes,



Jesus seems to have prayed for his tormentors actually while the iron spikes were being driven through his hands and feet; indeed the imperfect tense suggests that he kept praying, kept repeating his entreaty, “Father, forgive them; for they know not what they do” (Luke 23:34). If the cruel torture of crucifixion could not silence our Lord’s prayer for his enemies, what pain, pride, prejudice, or sloth could justify the silencing of ours?

Take some time now, bowing your heads and closing your eyes, to pray for those people you mentioned earlier. Ask God to help you love them with your actions, as well as your emotions.

Why, then, does Jesus say that we should love our enemies, and pray for our persecutors?

First, in Matthew 5:12, Jesus says, “Rejoice and be glad, for your reward is great in heaven, for so they persecuted the prophets who were before you.” Scholar D.A. Carson states this: “To be persecuted because of righteousness is to align oneself with the prophets; but to bless and pray for those who persecute us is to align oneself with the character of God.”

Our Lord Jesus says, in verse 45, “So that you may be sons of your Father in heaven.” You may remember Matthew 5:9. It reads, “Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called the sons of God.” Why do we make peace, loving our enemies and praying for our persecutors? So that we may be known as the “sons of God,” those of our “Father in heaven.” Now that doesn’t mean that we show love and that we earn our sonship. Jesus isn’t teaching salvation by works. He is teaching, like in Matthew 5:9, that loving and praying for enemies evidences that we are God’s true children. By being peacemakers through our love and prayers, we display the love of our God, our Father, demonstrating that we are truly His sons.

Many would claim the name of Christ, would say they’re children of God, but don’t love and don’t pray in order to make peace with enemies. Regardless if someone has prayed some mantra or has been immersed in some water, such a person is not authentically saved. Why? Because, if we are a child of God, we must look like our heavenly Father.

Ever since Hadley was born, people have said that he looks just like me. Now, you could do a blood test or a DNA test and prove that he’s mine, but it’s not necessary for most people, because we look so similar. In the same way, there is no such thing as a “Holy Spirit” test, where we can take someone’s spiritual temperature or draw blood and know whether or not they’re saved. However, we can look at them to see if they resemble the Father.


And here we see the connection between verses 44 and 45. We should love our enemies and pray for them—indeed, true believers will—because our heavenly Father loves His enemies. Jesus says, “For he makes his sun rise on the evil and on the good, and sends rain on the just and on the unjust.” Tomorrow morning, apart from the return of Christ or their death, the sun is going to rise over the house of our unbelieving neighbors, just like it will for us. There are farmers out there who work Sundays, who don’t follow Christ, who rely on, and will receive, rain from God on their crops. God is totally in control of the rising and setting of the sun, as well as the water cycle, and He doesn’t just bless Christians with both. He blesses non-Christians, as well.

This is what Calvin and others since have called “common grace.” Wayne Grudem defines it like this: “Common grace is the grace of God by which He gives people innumerable blessings that are not part of salvation.” This is opposed to special grace, which brings salvation to God’s people. He goes on to point out that common grace is different from special grace in its results. It does not bring salvation. It is different in its recipients. Common grace is given both to believers and unbelievers. It is different in its source. Common grace doesn’t flow directly from Christ’s work on the cross, as special grace does.

So, as we look at the world, all things good come from God, and, by His goodness, even unbelievers experience some of those blessings. Anytime we see an unbelieving scientist find an amazing cure, we see God’s common grace. Anytime we hear beautiful music come out of the mouths and through the hands of an unbeliever, we see His amazing common grace. Anytime we see an unbeliever tell the truth or help an old lady across the street, we see common grace. I could go on. God is good to those that are unlovable, that haven’t loved Him first, that won’t love Him back.

I love Hadley and Melia. I love them more than the neighbors across the street. I have an intimacy with them that I don’t have with those other kids. I share things with them that the other kids don’t get. They’re my family. God, in the same way, shows His salvation, and the blessings that correspond with it, only to His children. But He still pours out His goodness in amazing ways to all. He still gives many good gifts to those who don’t call Him Father. This is common grace.

God is good to unbelievers in countless ways, and, biblically speaking, those people are His enemies. Romans 8:7 teaches that the unbelieving heart is “hostile to God.” 1 Corinthians 2:14 says that the sinful heart finds God’s truth to be “foolishness.” Listen again to Romans 5:8-10.


Romans 5:8 but God shows his love for us in that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us. 9 Since, therefore, we have now been justified by his blood, much more shall we be saved by him from the wrath of God. 10 For if while we were enemies we were reconciled to God by the death of his Son, much more, now that we are reconciled, shall we be saved by his life.

Brothers and sisters, we once were enemies of God. We were hostile toward Him. His wrath was upon us. But He saved us. He reconciled us to Himself. Take a few minutes right now, bowing your heads and closing your eyes, and ponder where God has brought you.

Now, if God loves His enemies, and that once included us, how can we not love our enemies? God has every right to pour down his wrath on every unbeliever in the world, right this minute, fire and brimstone and all, but He doesn’t. He pours out His grace. How dare we pour out wrath! Why, again, should we love our enemies? Why should we be good to those who hate us? Because we should image the character of our Father in heaven, and He does exactly that.

And, folks, as I began, unbelievers are rightly skeptical. They look at the Bible and see a loving God, and they meet people wearing nametags that read “Christ” who look nothing like Him. They turn on the television and see so-called Christian leaders spewing out venom at lost people. They then say, “You don’t look anything like God. I don’t want you.” They reject the church, God’s community.

Or, worse, they look at unloving, wrathful, so-called Christians, and they associate them with the God of the Bible. They look at them and say, “If that’s what God is like, I want nothing of Him.” And they reject God himself.

What they need to see, brothers and sisters, is a group of people who love God and others. Unbelievers need to witness a church that reflects God’s loving character and makes God our Savior attractive. They need to be won to a loving church and a loving God, and usually it takes place in that exact order. Will we look like our heavenly Father?

I read a news story this week about a man who led a policeman on a high-speed chase. The criminal looked up and saw a cloud of dust, realizing that the patrolman had been in an accident. He drove back and helped the policeman, saving his life. I wonder, brothers and sisters, if we looked behind us, if we would find enemies, in our dust, to whom we should return to repent and love.

Why, then, should we love our enemies? We’ve seen that, by doing that, we reflect our Father’s character. But, second, we should love our enemies, because we should be different from the world. Listen again to verses 46 and 47 of chapter 5.

Matthew 5:46 For if you love those who love you, what reward do you have? Do not even the tax collectors do the same? 47 And if you greet only your brothers, what more are you doing than others? Do not even the Gentiles do the same?

Christ’s point is simple. Non-Christians love those who are lovable, those who love them first, those who love them back. Unbelievers love their buddies. They love their family members. They love anyone that is good to them. When we say that unbelievers are depraved, it doesn’t mean that they don’t do anything good. They still in some way reflect God’s image. They do love. But it’s generally love for their own, and not for their enemies.

Jesus talks about the “tax collectors” here. Now, we dread it if the IRS comes knocking on our door, but tax guys were hated in those days. Basically, the Romans had this pyramid system of men that collected taxes from the people of the Empire. A Roman boss would have people under him. Those people would have people under them. Somewhere down the chain were found the Jews whose job it was to collect from their own people. Apparently, each person was required to get a quota, and whatever else he could get, he was able to keep. Therefore, corruption was widespread. These men were by and large extortionists.

Not only were they thieves, but they were seen as traitors. They were working for the Romans, taking money from the chosen people to give to vile pagans. They were seen as sell-outs.

In addition, they were also seen as dirty. Their business meant that they frequently interacted with the Roman bosses, making them ceremonially unclean. Jesus says, "Those tax collectors that you find wicked—even they love their babies!" Even they love their friends! Even they enjoy their fellow tax thieves!

Jesus also mentions the “Gentiles.” Not only did the worst of their people love their own, but those outside of the people of God did, as well. Those that Jews often called “dogs,” the Gentiles, those that they saw as enemies, as we’ve seen—they greet their own. It reminds me of growing up in small-town Missouri, in Drexel, where every car or truck or pedestrian you encountered you waved at—unless, of course, you were a total snob. Even the Gentiles, the “dogs,” show courtesy and respect to one another by giving them a greeting, wishing them wellbeing. They say, “Hello” or “Good Morning” or flash a friendly wave or smile!



He first says, “What reward do you have?” If you don’t love your enemies, if you only love those who love you, you don’t get a reward. You get what the tax collectors and Gentiles get—no reward or, better, judgment. Only those that look like the Father get an eternal reward with him.

He second says, “What more are you doing than others?” This is a key sentence. How are we separating ourselves from the Gentiles, the unbelievers? If we’re not loving our enemies, we’re no different from the world. We’re doing what regular people apart from Christ do.

A new friend of mine was telling me about a concert she attended that turned into a political bashing session. One minute she was hearing music, and the next she was hearing screaming about conservatives and Christians and the like. Those people who probably also say that Christians hate seemed to not throw much love our direction. They primarily love those that love them.

Here is the key: Jesus wants us not only to go beyond the Pharisee—those who say they love in God’s name, but really hate those different from them, but also the pagan—those who may defy God but end up only loving those like them anyway. As we move and live in the District, where there are many unbelievers or “pagans,” we have to show how we’re different from the Pharisaic picture of religion that they have seen, while also showing how we differ from them, as well. We have to “exceed” the love of the Pharisee and the pagan.

The world operates, as John Stott says, through extending retaliation and recompense. Like we saw last week, you show me evil, and I’ll show you evil right back. It works the same way with good. “You show me good, and I’ll show you good right back. You scratch my back, and I’ll scratch yours.” Loving those who love you isn’t that big of a deal. Everybody does that.

In addition, loving and greeting people just like you is what we call narcissistic. We get that term from Greek mythology, from the Greek man named Narcissus who rejected the love of a nymph named Echo, and was judged by the gods to fall in love with his own reflection in the water. He got so frustrated from that that he ended up turning into a flower.

Brothers and sisters, when we surround ourselves with people that look just like us and love them exclusively, it’s like we’re looking at our reflection. We’re being vain, egotistical, and selfish. We’re narcissists. We’re loving extensions of ourselves. And this comes naturally to fallen humans. Everybody does it.


This is why we must not only love people different from us outside of the church, but we also must love people different from inside of the church. My prayer is that we will become a church that is diverse—generationally, ethnically, socio-economically, and otherwise.

Then Columbia will look at us and say, “My how those people love us—people who don’t agree with them. And, look at how different they are, and they still love each other!”

The love of Christ should propel us toward loving people that don’t look just like us—inside the church or out.

As Alfred Plummer once said, “To return evil for good is devilish; to return good for good is human; to return good for evil is divine.”

Take a moment now and pray once again. Ask God to search your heart. In what ways are you not living differently from those in the world?

I want to turn to our last point for this morning. Third, let’s examine the calling to perfection. Jesus says, in Matthew 5:48, “You therefore must be perfect, as your heavenly Father is perfect.” Now some people have tried to argue that this teaches perfectionism, but that is ruled out by the context. One that is “blessed” is “poor in spirit,” says Matthew 5:3. One who is “blessed” also “hungers and thirst for righteousness.” He never arrives, at least not in this life. In addition, the one transformed by grace prays as Jesus commands, in Matthew 6:12, “Forgive us our debts, as we also have forgiven our debtors.” We will be imperfect sinners needing this prayer until we are with Christ. This passage doesn’t teach that we can be perfect in this life.

What, then, does it teach? This verse seems to cap off today’s passage, as well as Matthew 5:17-48 as a whole. Turn with me, if you will, to Leviticus 19:1-2. Interestingly, this is in the same context as our “love your neighbor as yourself” statement. It reads, “And the LORD spoke to Moses, saying, "Speak to all the congregation of the people of Israel and say to them, You shall be holy, for I the LORD your God am holy.” This is similar to Matthew 5:48 with two key differences. First, the word “perfect” is substituted for “holy.” The law was given in order that men and women of Israel might reflect the character of God. The Sermon on the Mount, however, paints a higher standard, that exterior rules, God-given or man-made, can’t accomplish what God wants. God demands a perfection that goes deep into the heart, changing someone from the inside-out. Perfection, not holiness, is demanded, although perfection is really true holiness. We’re not just called to be set-apart for God. We’re called to be perfect like God.
But the new standard—perfection—is accomplished by a change in orientation. Second, the word “Father” is used. This moves from the covenant name of God, Yahweh, to a term of familial intimacy, “Father.” We are not just God’s people. We are His children. We have been born again and adopted into His family. He is working His perfection in us. And one day, He will make us, His children, perfect.

Note also quite importantly that, in the gospels, God is only called the “Father” of believers and of Christ. Others are His creation, but they are not His children. Only we are being transformed—not pagans, not Pharisees—to display the radical sort of righteousness we see in the Sermon on the Mount.

Note also that this passage reminds us that the church has now replaced Israel as the people of God. They were to be holy as He is holy. We are to be perfect as He is perfect. We are the new community of the faithful. As 1 Peter 2:9 puts it, we are a “chosen race, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, a people for his own possession.” We are the new Israel, the church of the living God.

What, then, does verse 48 teach? It teaches, once again, that what is required by our Lord, here in the Sermon, is not a sham of holiness that is external and false, but a true, inner perfection in the heart—one that is taught and caught by others. And here, it refers to an amazing, divine sort of love.

In conclusion, I want to take you back to the Good Samaritan story that we looked at in the beginning. First, Jesus asked the man, in response to his question, what the law taught about salvation. The man responded with the words: ‘love God and love neighbor.” Jesus responded then with “Do this and you will live.” Christ was clearly trying to get the man to see how far he fell short of those two commandments. The lawyer then responded by asking, “Who is my neighbor?” The passage then says that he was doing this, “desiring to justify himself.” He was trying to get Jesus to dumb down those commandments, making them manageable for him, making them keepable by him. But Jesus responds with the shocking story of the Good Samaritan. As we look at the demands of the Sermon on the Mount, as we look at this call for perfection, we should fall on our knees, being “poor in spirit.”

Our only hope is the perfection of Christ. He lived a completely perfect life, completely keeping the law, and He died a perfect death, perfectly suffering for those who don’t keep the law. When we trust in Him and not ourselves, unlike the young lawyer here, we are clothed in the perfect righteousness of Christ, are seen as holy in God’s sight, and God is glorified. Our only hope is Christ in us.

Second, the man asked Jesus, “Teacher, what shall I do to inherit eternal life?” Jesus responds with the two greatest commandments and the story of the Good Samaritan. Our loving our enemies does not gain us salvation, but it reflects it. The transformation God performs in His children by grace leaves them loving God passionately and loving neighbor fervently. They look like Him, different from those who don’t call Him Father, loving their enemies and praying for their persecutors.

Not only does the gospel bring us to God and clothe us in Christ’s perfection. But it transforms us, working the perfection of Christ, albeit slowly, within us. Only those who love their enemies will be called sons of God. We need His grace that justifies us to sanctify us as well.

I will never forget going to hear missionary Steve Saint speak at Evangel College down in Springfield. His father was martyred, along with Jim Eliot, by Indians in Ecuador. Saint came to speak, and right beside him was an Indian friend who had speared His father. Elizabeth Eliot and his father’s sister, Rachel Saint, had returned to that village to minister to those people after their husbands’ deaths. Steve Saint later went and lived there after the death of his aunt. Steve and other members of his family had, by God’s grace, learned to love their enemies and those enemies were now their brothers and sisters in Christ.

I want to finish in a way consistent with the rest of this sermon. As a church, we are committed to reaching the District, downtown Columbia with the gospel. We know that this part of the city is perhaps more hostile to the gospel than any part of the city and most parts of the state. Close your eyes, bow your heads. Picture some of those people. Pray for them. Pray that we would reach them. Pray that they would know we are Christians by our love. Then I will close in prayer.

"Forgoing Justice through the Gospel of Grace"

“Forgoing Justice through the Gospel of Grace”
Matthew 5:38-42, 8/06/06, Kevin P. Larson, Grace Church of Columbia

Last summer, tragedy struck on Mizzou’s Faurot Field. Young linebacker Aaron O’Neal collapsed on the field following a workout and died. The community was shocked and grieved along with the football team. The local medical examiner found that the young man had viral meningitis, and this caused his untimely death.

Shortly thereafter, his estranged father, Larry O’Neal, brought a lawsuit against several officials from the university. He was seeking damages for apparent neglect by employees of the athletic department. In the face of great tragedy, this man sought justice. I begin with this question this morning: is that the proper, Christian way to respond?

Let us read our text for this morning. Turn to Matthew 5:38-42.

Matthew 5:38 "You have heard that it was said, 'An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth.' 39 But I say to you, Do not resist the one who is evil. But if anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also. 40 And if anyone would sue you and take your tunic, let him have your cloak as well. 41 And if anyone forces you to go one mile, go with him two miles. 42 Give to the one who begs from you, and do not refuse the one who would borrow from you.

We are nearing the close of a major section in the Sermon on the Mount, Matthew 5:21-48. In Matthew 5:17-20, Jesus speaks of the Pharisees—those that would take God’s law lightly and teach others to do the same. He then says, in verse 20, “For I tell you, unless your righteousness exceeds that of the scribes and Pharisees, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven.” In verses 21-48, Christ then details what they were doing and what they were teaching, showing clearly what the righteousness that surpasses them looks like.

Last week, we looked at Christ’s teaching on oaths. The Pharisees were using oaths, not as they were intended—to encourage truth, but rather to evade truth. Jesus calls us to be people that are so full of truth, that we don’t even need to swear. Just a simple “yes” or “no” should suffice.

This week, we see the Pharisees again abusing God’s law. We again hear them quoting something God has said, and we see them misapplying it and using it to their own ends. Let us begin this morning by looking at, first, the teaching of the Pharisees. Second, we’ll look at the teaching of Jesus.

First, let’s consider the teaching of the Pharisees. To broadly summarize, Jesus’s opponents were teaching that God’s people should personally administer justice toward others.
Where did they get that idea? They got it from the Old Testament. Listen again to Matthew 5:38. It reads, “You have heard that it was said, ‘An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth.’” This statement, unlike those of the past two weeks, is directly from the Old Testament. Read with me three times where this phrase is used.

First, turn to Exodus 21:22-25.

Exodus 21:22 "When men strive together and hit a pregnant woman, so that her children come out, but there is no harm, the one who hit her shall surely be fined, as the woman's husband shall impose on him, and he shall pay as the judges determine. 23 But if there is harm, then you shall pay life for life, 24 eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, 25 burn for burn, wound for wound, stripe for stripe.

Next, turn over to Leviticus 24. Look at verses 19-20.

Leviticus 24:19 If anyone injures his neighbor, as he has done it shall be done to him, 20 fracture for fracture, eye for eye, tooth for tooth; whatever injury he has given a person shall be given to him.

Third, look with me at Deuteronomy 19:16-21.

Deuteronomy 19:16 If a malicious witness arises to accuse a person of wrongdoing, 17 then both parties to the dispute shall appear before the LORD, before the priests and the judges who are in office in those days. 18 The judges shall inquire diligently, and if the witness is a false witness and has accused his brother falsely, 19 then you shall do to him as he had meant to do to his brother. So you shall purge the evil from your midst. 20 And the rest shall hear and fear, and shall never again commit any such evil among you. 21 Your eye shall not pity. It shall be life for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot.

This phrase, as you can see—“eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth”—is used three times in the Old Testament. But what was the meaning of these words?

I’ve taught most of you the benefits of doing Bible study in a “coma.” COMA is an acronym for context, observation, meaning, and application. You examine what surrounds the words, their context. You look at the words themselves—what they mean, how they fit into a sentence. That is observation. You then look at the meaning. What was the author’s original intent by those words, by that sentence? Finally, then, and only then, you get to application. How does this passage apply to us—right here, right now?

The Pharisees, I argue, did the observation and the application part. We’ll see what their specific error was in a bit. But to rightly understand the phrase, we need to understand the words’ context, as well as the words’ meaning.


Regarding their context, we see particularly in the Deuteronomy passage that those words were given as part of a legal code for a nation. There you have individuals involved in a dispute gathered before judges. The judges hear the case, make a decision, and then administer justice. The “an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth” idea was not meant to be applied by individuals toward one another. It was given to the nation of Israel.

Regarding their meaning, it’s important to understand what the statements sought to accomplish and what they sought to prevent. First, as John Stott notes, they “defined justice.” What punishment fit certain crimes? Second, they “restrained revenge.” What were the limits of justice? The statements gave us the principle of “exact retribution.” Yes, crimes deserved punishment. But they deserved only so much punishment. In other words, if a friend knocks out your tooth, he doesn’t deserve to have his neck slashed. He only deserves to lose his tooth.

As you know, sinful human beings are rarely satisfied with simply giving precise justice and no more. Across America, just last night, undoubtedly hundreds of people were shot and killed over drug money. Obviously getting the money back or the drugs wasn’t enough. Somebody had to die. Such is human nature. We typically aren’t satisfied with exact retribution.

So the statements were given to a nation. And the statements were given to define and limit punishment. What had the Pharisees done with these words?

Again, they had observed the words rightly. They could read. They could understand what they communicated. But they didn’t get their meaning. They missed their context. They went straight from observation to application and used these terms to justify individual action, against their context, and personal revenge, against their meaning.

Two weeks ago, we saw how the Pharisees took regulations on divorce and used them to justify divorce itself. Last week, we saw how the Pharisees took statements about oaths and used them to evade the truth. This week, we see that the Pharisees had taken a statement in the Old Testament that was designed to limit individual retaliation and had used it to support it.

So, in other words, they were teaching, “If he pokes my eye out, then I’m gonna poke his out.” “If he insults you, curse him right back.” “If he takes your cow, go grab his.” They were angry, vengeful people, and they even had a Bible verse to support such actions. This was the teaching of the Pharisees. Administer justice individually. Give that guy what he deserves. The Bible says you can. And we have every indication that they were actually practicing this.
This should give us pause for a second. First, consider how careful we must be with our Bibles. Truly, you can support anything you want with the Scriptures. Greg Koukl of Stand to Reason, a podcast I highly recommend, has a little pamphlet entitled, “Never Read a Bible Verse.” In it, he argues just how dangerous it is to read verses apart from their context. We should never read just one verse. Why? Because it’s impossible to get the meaning of a verse without understanding the context of that verse.

Second, our hearts, apart from grace, want to twist the Scriptures. You can look at the Pharisees here and think, “What a bunch of wicked idiots!” We may think we’re above them, and we would never do such a thing. But the Bible portrays humans, apart from Christ, as depraved. Not only are we prone to misunderstand the Scriptures, but our sinful nature wants to twist them. That’s why you can search on the internet and find people using the Bible to defend all sorts of wicked things. Apart from the Holy Spirit, this is where we all would be. The Pharisees look more like us, apart from Christ, than we would like.

God gave this “eye for an eye” principle of exact retribution in these passages to reduce violence among His people. He gave it to them as a nation to be exacted in their courts of law. The Pharisees, however, took this principle and used it to justify individual vengeance, ignoring, of course, that the law forbids that, as well. In Leviticus 19:18, not far from the “eye for an eye” passage we read earlier, we hear God say, “You shall not take vengeance or bear a grudge against the sons of your own people, but you shall love your neighbor as yourself: I am the LORD.” This is exactly what the Pharisees were doing, and they were pitting God’s word against itself, justifying their actions by quoting another verse. They had used a verse limiting retaliation to justify retaliation. They had ignored the context surrounding their proof-text.

The book of Proverbs that the Pharisees would also have known spoke against this. Proverbs 20:22 teaches, “Do not say, ‘I will repay evil’; wait for the LORD, and He will deliver you.” Additionally, Proverbs 24:29 says this: “Do not say, ‘I will do to him as he has done to me; I will pay the man back for what he has done.’” But this is exactly what the Pharisees were doing! They were taking the law in their own hands, paying people back for their wrong.

Now, it is doubtful that, at this point in their history, the Jews were actually poking out eyes and yanking out teeth. It seems clear that, should someone get his eye gouged out, he would receive a payment of damages from the offender. He likely wouldn’t get the man’s eye poked out. This brings the passage even closer to our day. If a man got injured by another, he would just sue. He would get money. The Pharisees were thinking, “He hurt me. I’m going to take everything he’s got.”
They had wicked hearts that were being evidenced by teaching and practicing personal vengeance. This was the way of the Pharisee.

Second, let us consider the teachings of Jesus. The way of the Christian, the one transformed by grace, surpasses that of the Pharisee. He says this, once again, in verses 39-42:

39 But I say to you, Do not resist the one who is evil. But if anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also. 40 And if anyone would sue you and take your tunic, let him have your cloak as well. 41 And if anyone forces you to go one mile, go with him two miles. 42 Give to the one who begs from you, and do not refuse the one who would borrow from you.

While the Pharisees were teaching that one should administer justice, Jesus teaches that His own will rather administer mercy. Before we look at exactly what Jesus says, let me review what I mentioned many weeks ago when we looked at Matthew 5:7. How should we understand justice and mercy?

First, all people, as sinners standing before a holy God, deserve justice. All deserve retribution for their sins. God is a just God. He punishes sin. Of course, as we look in the Bible, we see some people don’t receive justice. Some get non-justice. Some people don’t get what they deserve.

Second, in the category of non-justice are found both injustice and mercy. Injustice involves not getting what you deserve in a bad way. Mercy involves not getting what you deserve in a good way. Biblically speaking, as we’re all sinners, and we serve a good and holy God, no one receives injustice. If we receive punishment, it’s just.

Some, however, do receive mercy. Those of us in Christ don’t receive the penalty for our sins that we deserve. God is merciful to us in Christ. We don’t receive justice. He is merciful to us.

This is important to understand, as it frames salvation in its proper light. We’re not all morally o.k. people who deserve to be saved. We’re all sinners who deserve judgment. For God to save any of us is amazing grace. It’s pure mercy.

Third, it’s God’s job to administer justice. It’s not ours. Our command now, as we’ll see next week, is to love our enemies. Only God ultimately judges people, now in part, but in the future in full. Turn once again to Romans 12.




Romans 12:17 Repay no one evil for evil, but give thought to do what is honorable in the sight of all. 18 If possible, so far as it depends on you, live peaceably with all. 19 Beloved, never avenge yourselves, but leave it to the wrath of God, for it is written, "Vengeance is mine, I will repay, says the Lord." 20 To the contrary, "if your enemy is hungry, feed him; if he is thirsty, give him something to drink; for by so doing you will heap burning coals on his head." 21 Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good.

Vengeance is His, not ours. We can be 100% confident, as we interact with those around us, that either Christ was punished on the cross for their sins—they are or will become a Christian, or, one day, they will be punished by the Father eternally for their sins—they are lost. So, as people wrong us, we know that that sin will be paid for one day in one way or another. Punishing that sin is not our job. Punishing them is inflicting double-jeopardy upon them.

God, of course, has put in place certain institutions that are used by Him to punish sin. First, in Romans 13, right where we just were, it says this:

Romans 13:1 Let every person be subject to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and those that exist have been instituted by God. 2 Therefore whoever resists the authorities resists what God has appointed, and those who resist will incur judgment. 3 For rulers are not a terror to good conduct, but to bad. Would you have no fear of the one who is in authority? Then do what is good, and you will receive his approval, 4 for he is God's servant for your good. But if you do wrong, be afraid, for he does not bear the sword in vain. For he is the servant of God, an avenger who carries out God's wrath on the wrongdoer. 5 Therefore one must be in subjection, not only to avoid God's wrath but also for the sake of conscience.

Governing authorities are put in place by God to execute “judgment,” to “bear the sword,” and to administer God’s “wrath.”

Second, God has also put in place His church. It is not the responsibility of His church to punish the world, but rather her own. This is why we talk much here about something practiced very little in today’s evangelical world—church discipline. If one of us strays from our covenant vows in doctrine or morals, we will discipline him or her. We will execute judgment—excommunicating that person from the church, if absolutely necessary.

Third, God has also ordained the family. Just as there are persons in authority in the government, governors and presidents and the like, and the church, her elders, God has set up parents as authority figures in the home. Fathers and mothers execute God’s justice, punishing children who disobey for their good.

As Proverbs 13:24 states, “Whoever spares the rod hates his son, but he who loves him is diligent to discipline him.” Whether in the home or in the church or in the state, faithful leaders use the “rod” for good. Withholding discipline results in chaos and great harm.

This administration of justice, however, is never meant for the individual level. This is the realm Jesus speaks of in this passage. Each of the realms I have mentioned, means by which God judges on earth, are corporate. On an individual level, we are not to administer justice, but rather mercy. This is the point of Jesus’s teaching here. Let us look at each of those ideas in turn.

First, verse 39 teaches that we are not to administer justice. Jesus says, “But I say to you, do not resist the one who is evil.”

What, first of all, does this not teach? First, it’s clear in the Bible that we are to resist evil and the evil one, Satan. 1 Peter 5:8-9 reads like this,

1 Peter 5:8 Be sober-minded; be watchful. Your adversary the devil prowls around like a roaring lion, seeking someone to devour. 9 Resist him, firm in your faith, knowing that the same kinds of suffering are being experienced by your brotherhood throughout the world.

In addition, James 4:7 says, “Resist the devil, and he will flee from you.” Ephesians 6:13 seems broader than just Satan. It states, “Therefore, take up the whole armor of God, that you may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand firm.” Clearly we are to stand firm against evil.

Second, think again of those three instituted spheres that I just mentioned. In the family, evil must be resisted. Parents that don’t discipline their children will live to regret it. In the church, evil must be handled swiftly and decisively. Otherwise, as 1 Corinthians 5:6 states, “a little leaven leavens the whole lump.” The heresy or immorality will spread and wreck the church. In the state, evil must be resisted. As we said earlier, the state must wield the sword, punishing wicked citizens.

This, I am convinced, includes, at all three levels, not only punishing those on the inside, but protecting from those on the outside. The head of the household, the man, is called to protect his family. He can’t sit there and quote Matthew 5:38 while some slasher murders his children. In the church, the elders must protect the sheep from wolves that come in to destroy. In the state, the governing officials must protect civilians from invaders. This, I hold, is part of what it means for the authorities to “bear the sword.”

So, no, I don’t believe that this passage, as Tolstoy and others have argued, teaches pacifism. I don’t think it shows conclusively that believers should always oppose war. Although aggressive, offensive wars should be protested, God has given government to citizens to protect them from invasion. In fact, if we say armies are bad, then so are police forces. Both protect the nation, using force when necessary.

In addition, there is no indication that God has not called some believers to faithfully serve in the state, wielding the sword of judgment. John the Baptist, in Luke 3:14, when questioned by soldiers as to how they should follow God, doesn’t tell them to leave the military. He tells them to be godly in the military.

In addition, the immediate context of the passage indicates that not all resistance is barred. In last week’s passage, Jesus says, “Do not take an oath at all,” but it is clear from biblical precept and example that oaths are permitted, and Jesus is saying, “If you’re going to use oaths to evade the truth rather than ensure the truth, don’t swear.” Just as there are times for oaths, there are times to “resist people.” I already have mentioned some of those times. If we don’t take seriously the hyperbolic nature of what Jesus is saying in the Sermon on the Mount, we’ll all be sitting around with gouged-out eyes and cut off hands, and we won’t be able to serve in the military if we wanted to.

I will also argue in a minute that, if this means that we never resist evil people, then verse 42, which says to “give to the one who begs from you,” says that we must never refuse a beggar either. The context seems to indicate we shouldn’t take Jesus’s statement that absolutely.

Third, you might say, “Ok. I can see that we might at times resist evil in defense of others, but we certainly can’t resist evil when it comes to us personally.” Of course, as we’ve already read, when confronted spiritually by the Enemy, by his schemes, or by his agents, we must resist. But, there is also no indication from this passage that we can not defend ourselves physically. If we witnessed a young lady being attacked, if police were not present, we would act as good citizens and Christians by defending one powerless from evil. In the same way, if we were abducted and someone had a knife to our throat, this passage doesn’t prevent us from defending ourselves.

Why? Because this passage does teach that we must not engage in personal retaliation. The Pharisees were using the “eye for an eye” passage as a proof-text for getting even. Jesus is saying, “Don’t get even.” He isn’t saying, “Don’t fight off a burglar.”

This verse teaches, once again, that we are not to administer justice. We are not to get revenge as individuals. Why? As we read before, that is the Lord’s job. He is the one who will execute vengeance—now in part, but future in full.

This reminds me of my wife’s story that I believe many of you have not heard. When Amy was 12, her mother died as a result of a failed tonsillectomy. The doctor made a mistake, sent her home, and she essentially bled to death right before my wife and her brother in their home.
A huge lawsuit and settlement resulted. Amy began receiving large payments at age 18, which resulted mainly in a bunch of sin and rebellion in her life. She looks back and swears that suing the doctor was the wrong thing to do. We have honestly had arguments in the past, where I tried to convince her that it was right and just. But the more I ponder it and consider this text, I think she is right. It is not our job to “resist the one who is evil,” as this passage teaches. God is to be our defender. Vengeance is His. We are not to administer justice.

Second, verse 42 teaches that we are to administer mercy. Verse 42 once again reads, “Give to the one who begs from you, and do not refuse the one who would borrow from you.” What this doesn’t teach is a new law—that we must empty out our pockets to whoever asks whenever he asks. The book of Proverbs speaks of the potential foolishness of giving to strangers. Chapter 11, verse 15 reads, “Whoever puts up security for a stranger will surely suffer harm, but he who hates striking hands in pledge is secure.” Just as verse 39 doesn’t mean that we must never resist evil, this doesn’t mean that we always must give. If somebody mugs us, we’re free to run. If we know someone is taking money right to the liquor store, we’re not wise to give.

I read this news story this week that spoke of Indian doctors trying to convince beggars there to amputate their limbs to grow their earnings. One doctor was quoted as saying something like, “If you have two beggars there, and one of them is lame, the lame one is going to get more money.” There are truly those out there to whom it is not wise to give.

What this passage is teaching is for us to be generous people, willing to share freely and loan freely. The Old Testament law required this. Listen to Deuteronomy 15:7-11.

Deuteronomy 15:7 "If among you, one of your brothers should become poor, in any of your towns within your land that the LORD your God is giving you, you shall not harden your heart or shut your hand against your poor brother, 8 but you shall open your hand to him and lend him sufficient for his need, whatever it may be. 9 Take care lest there be an unworthy thought in your heart and you say, 'The seventh year, the year of release is near,' and your eye look grudgingly on your poor brother, and you give him nothing, and he cry to the LORD against you, and you be guilty of sin. 10 You shall give to him freely, and your heart shall not be grudging when you give to him, because for this the LORD your God will bless you in all your work and in all that you undertake. 11 For there will never cease to be poor in the land. Therefore I command you, 'You shall open wide your hand to your brother, to the needy and to the poor, in your land.'

In addition, numerous Old Testament texts indicate that our lending should be done without interest. Deuteronomy 23:19 states, "You shall not charge interest on loans to your brother, interest on money, interest on food, interest on anything that is lent for interest.”

Jesus’s point here is that we are to be in the business of administering mercy—giving people what they likely do not deserve. And as Deuteronomy 15:10 says, it should be done “freely” and without hearts that are “grudging.”

Several weeks ago, we were approached as a church by a man seeking help. He had started a new job and needed some money to get to his next paycheck. He also needed money for a shuttle ride to Kansas City to do some training for his new job. He asked for some help. He viewed it as a loan; we viewed it as a gift. We assisted him. We have never heard from him since. In fact, he sent his $3400 emergency room bill to our P.O. Box, something we’re clearly not obligated to pay. Did we do the right thing? I’m convinced we did. We gave freely and not grudgingly, believing the best, trusting God to guide the situation. We won’t always do everything right in this regard, but I think this illustrates how I want us to handle dealing with the needy in the future.

It comes down to our “default mode.” When you open up Microsoft Word, it launches a new document, and it comes up in a Times New Roman font that is 12 point. That’s what it defaults to unless you tweak it. What do we default to? Do we default to avenging ourselves? Do we default to hoarding what God has given us? Or do we freely give and trust God as our defender? Our “default mode” indicates where are hearts truly are found. And, in this Sermon on the Mount, Jesus is calling us to have a deep, inner righteousness of the heart.

We are called, in this passage, not to administer justice, but to administer mercy. Both of these were modeled by Jesus. 1 Peter 2:23 says, “When he was reviled, he did not revile in return; when he suffered, he did not threaten, but continued entrusting himself to him who judges justly.” He didn’t seek revenge. And we know that He gave freely. He fed the 5000. He healed people. He gave His life. And the rest of the passage says that He did this because “He continued entrusting himself to him who judges justly.” In other words, God the Father would avenge Him. He would meet His needs. Verse 21 teaches that we are to follow His example in this, walking in His steps.

Both of these are limited by biblical love. Our non-resistance must cease when love for our brothers is encroached. We can’t sit there while the sheep are slaughtered. We can’t watch while one of our children is kidnapped. Additionally, our giving must cease when love for brothers is compromised. Our giving of mercy must be limited by mercy itself. In other words, sometimes we must let people feel the consequences of their irresponsibility. That is merciful. We give unconditionally up-front, but we give conditions as we proceed, so that we enable the poor to be freed from their condition and not just supported in it. We should say, as Tim Keller writes, in his great book, Ministries of Mercy,

Friend, we are not withdrawing our mercy, just changing its form. We will continue to pray for you and visit you, and the minute you are willing to cooperate with us and make the changes that we believe are needed, we will resume our aid. Please realize that it is only out of love that we are doing this! (Keller, 98).

Both of these—not administering justice and administering mercy—however, must not be stacked with endless qualifications, so that we lose the “shock value” of what Jesus is teaching. We shouldn’t focus on the exceptions, but rather the rule. God wants us to be people who share with others freely, just as we’re also people that aren’t known for fighting back. These are radical statements Jesus is making, and they absolutely need to be heard.

If someone criticizes you, do you immediately defend yourself, returning the criticism?

If you meet a beggar on the street, do you instantly close up your heart toward him, not even considering that you could give?

What is your default mode?

Let us look at the three illustrations Jesus gives to teach these two principles. First, in verse 39, Christ says, “But if anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also.” What should be noted about this verse is that this deals with insult more than assault. It likely refers to a blow with the back of the hand, which was seen as grossly offensive in those days and still is today in that part of the world.

What also must be understood is that this is for us verbal as much as it is physical. Sure, there may be times where we take this quite literally and, if punched in the face, we give someone the opportunity to do it again. But more likely, we will be insulted by the words of others. We will then decide whether we will administer justice or mercy. Will we give them what they deserve or what they don’t deserve?

When someone at work looks at a project you’ve worked on and calls you a failure, what will you do? Or when someone tells you how to do something that you learned about months ago, what will you do? Will you hit back? Will you tolerate being insulted?

Second, in verse 40, our Lord says, “And if anyone would sue you and take your tunic, let him have your cloak as well.” What is important to note is that, for the Jew, your coat couldn’t be taken away. The poor needed it to keep them warm at night and function as somewhat of a bed, so God made sure they would be protected. Exodus 22:26-27 says this:
Exodus 22:26 If ever you take your neighbor's cloak in pledge, you shall return it to him before the sun goes down, 27 for that is his only covering, and it is his cloak for his body; in what else shall he sleep? And if he cries to me, I will hear, for I am compassionate.

The point is that we shouldn’t even cling to that which we consider to be our “rights.” We should be ready to be taken advantage of.

What should be understood is this for us is financial as much as material. For us, it’s less likely we’ll have somebody take an important possession, as it is that we’ll be wrongly cheated out of some money.

What do we do when we’re at the auto shop, and we know the guy fixed something that didn’t need fixed? What will we do when we get rear-ended in our car and one of those lawyers on TV tempts us to sue? Will we tolerate having our rights violated? Will we dispense justice or mercy? Will we give them what they deserve or what they don’t deserve?

Third, in verse 41, Jesus says, “And if anyone forces you to go one mile, go with him two miles.” This likely refers to the fact that, in the days of Roman occupation in Palestine, a Roman soldier could grab a Jewish person and command him to help him—often having him carry his pack for as much as a mile. We see something similar in Mark 15:21 when Simon of Cyrene was forced to carry the cross of our Lord.

What should be noted is that this can be humbling more than it is tiring. Not only was this work, but it was insulting. You were forced to aid the enemy. You were his slave, if only for an hour.

What do we do when we’re forced at work to do more than our fair share? How will we react if our teacher asks us to start a paper completely over? Will we tolerate being “taken advantage of?” Will we dispense justice or mercy? Will we give our bosses or co-workers or instructors what they deserve or what they don’t deserve?

The question we must ask with each of these is, “Do we have a heart that desires to glorify self or God?” Do we seek to defend self by taking justice in our own hands or preserve self by withholding mercy from others? Our Lord resisted vengeance, letting the Father be His defender. Our Lord shared mercy, trusting the Father to be His provider. Will we be like our Lord, humble and seeking His Father’s glory? Or will we strike back, fight for our rights, protest extra work?




The great George Mueller once said:

There was a day when I died, utterly died, died to George Mueller and his opinions, preferences, tastes and will; died to the world, its approval or censure; died to the approval or blame of even my brethren or friends; and since then I have studied only to show myself approved unto God.

Could you say what Mueller said there? Are we living for ourselves and our pride or for God and His glory?

I have been slowly reading through this excellent book, How People Change by Timothy Lane and Paul David Tripp. In it, the authors argue that trials in our life, what they call “heat,” show us what is in our hearts. They show us what our idols are. The trials either produce “fruit” or “thorns”—good, godly responses to trials, or wicked, ungodly responses to them. In other words, what is our “default mode?” Do we, when under “heat,” come back with seeking justice or showing mercy? Do we produce fruit or thorns?

The great missionary of old, Hudson Taylor, was apparently waiting one day for a boat ride across a river. A rich Chinese man walked up, seeking also a ferry, and, seeing Taylor in his traditional Chinese dress, he thought he was a peasant and pushed him out of the way, into the mud. The boat reached the shore and the wealthy man prepared to hop in. The man in the boat, however, who had witnessed it all, said, “The foreigner here was first. He will get into the boat.” The rich man was quite embarrassed as Taylor got into the boat. But, much to his surprise, the missionary beckoned the man into the boat with him. And, riding across the river, Taylor shared the good news and explained why he loved as he did. Brothers and sisters, that is mercy defeating justice. Taylor responded with fruit.

Let me close by giving three points of application. I think it is helpful to look, as I’ve done numerous times before in our grace group, as well as here on Sunday mornings, at ideas in four broad categories—God, gospel, church, mission. We’ve already considered how this relates to the doctrine of God this morning. Let’s consider the final three.

First, related to gospel—this shows our need for the gospel, as well as the work of the gospel. The only way that we can produce fruit and not thorns in the heat we experience is by the cross. We need the transforming power of the gospel to live in this way. We don’t naturally turn the other cheek, hand people our coats, or go the extra mile. We need God to radically change our hearts.




I remember during seminary somehow messing up my laptop so that it always defaulted, in Microsoft Word, to a 13-point, Arial font. This was very aggravating, because not only did that make my note files much longer and bulkier, but it caused things to open in Word looking messed up. Maybe you feel as if your default mode is messed up this morning. You can’t respond with mercy. You need the gospel. Come to Christ in faith.

This also shows us the work of the gospel. When Christ grabs a person, He makes him one who is radically different. That person, this side of heaven, is not perfect, but he desires to glorify God by entrusting Him with justice and by freely extending His mercy. In the face of heat, he more and more produces fruit. We can’t tolerate a gospel that leaves people unchanged. For example, we can’t call a head of a household saved who is harsh and violent with his family. Either he must repent or he must be evangelized.

Second, related to church—this withholding of justice and dispensing of mercy must be freely practiced within. The church must be a place where people honor Christ by not seeking vengeance against one another. In 1 Corinthians 6, Paul is chiding the Corinthians for bringing lawsuits against one another. He says, in verse 7, “Why not rather suffer wrong? Why not rather be defrauded?” How dare we be people who hammer each other with justice! It would be far better that we sucked it up and were hurt than avenge ourselves, bringing reproach to Christ. We must be a household of love.

In addition, we should be a place where people honor Christ by extending mercy to one another. In Acts, the early church is clearly seen as a group of people who shared with one another freely, even saying that they “had everything in common” (Acts 4:32). Acts 4:34 says that there was “not a needy person among them.” The church should be a picture of heaven on earth, where no one is needy and all are shown mercy. If we see needs in our community, Grace Church, we have to open up our wallets and deal with them.

Third, related to mission—this withholding of justice and dispensing of mercy must be boldly displayed without. The world must see us, once again, as a dynamic counter-culture. And, if we embody the radical teachings of Jesus in this passage, we will certainly look different. We live in a sinful world, and we live in America, where an entitlement mentality is coupled with rugged individualism. I have my rights, and I’m going to get what’s mine. The ideas presented here—forsaking personal retaliation and giving and loaning freely—are radically counter-cultural. Americans don’t turn the other cheek; they hit back. Americans don’t toss in their coat. They sue and take the shirt off your back. Americans don’t go the extra mile. They complain during the first mile. Our sinful nature resists these ideas, and our American upbringing reinforces that.
If we can embody these things as a church, the world will look in and see the difference the gospel makes. They’ll see that we don’t beat each other up. They’ll see that we rather show kindness to one other.

If we can embody these things as believers in the culture, outside of our church, the world will look and see a difference in us. They will mark the strange way we live. In our interaction with unbelievers, we won’t seek vengeance. We will rather give freely. The world will notice. They will be drawn to Christ. They will see people who look like Jesus, and they will want to be with us, as well as with Him.

When I first thought about this sermon, I had a different ending in mind. I thought I would bookend my opening illustration, of the Aaron O’Neal lawsuit, by contrasting the lawsuit of his father with the mercy of his mother. I remember his mother, Deborah O’Neal, initially making statements evidencing a faith in Christ, showing no desire to bring a lawsuit.

My research, however, leaves us with another ending. In July of this year, she joined the lawsuit. Brothers and sisters, I’m not in their shoes. I don’t directly feel their pain. But their conduct serves as an example for us, for good or bad. Will we, when faced with heat in life, respond in such a fashion? Knowing what I have heard of Aaron O’Neal, I doubt he would have wanted this. Will we seek justice or will we pursue mercy? I pray, as the church of God, that we will run hard after the latter.

As Jesus said in Matthew 5:7, “Blessed are the merciful, for they shall receive mercy.”

Sunday, August 06, 2006

Mars and Venus on Sesame Street


One of my favorite Southern profs, and an insightful cultural commentator, Dr. Russ Moore, discusses Sesame Street's recent decision to add a "girly girl" to the popular kids' show. Check it out here.

Saturday, August 05, 2006

Cut Off Your Hand?

In our recent look at Matthew 5:27-30, we saw how God tells us to be drastic with our sin, even cutting off our hands and gouging out our eyes to save our souls.

Read about this Colorado climber. He really did it.

Would you do this to save your life? What about your soul?

Wednesday, August 02, 2006

Forget Something?

Apparently MTV is now 25 years old. I'll never forget as a junior high kid, when my small Missouri town got cable TV. I then was explosed to a steady dose of Nickelodeon, The Brady Bunch reruns and MTV. I still remember the MTV video interlude--a rocket exploding upward, followed by an MTV flag waving on the moon, overdubbed by a rockin' guitar riff that will likely never escape my mind. Then came the music. I am an 80s kid. Now, when I see hear one of the melodies of my youth, it's often combined in my head with a video I saw during those formative years. Who can forget Cyndi Lauper's band of girls in "Girls Just Wanna Have Fun?" Who can forget Michael Jackson's "gang fight" in "Beat It?"

MTV used to play music. Now when you turn on the network, you get a steady barrage of sleazy reality shows. Rap videos have given way to house tours with rap stars. Where's the music? Many have noted how significantly MTV has impacted pop culture today. It has helped create a shallow, plastic, immoral "pop" culture.

My question for "By Grace Alone" readers: how much has MTV in particular, and pop culture, in general, shaped the church? Could not one visit many evangelical churches today, even those that have relatively conservative theology, and leave thinking, "Where's Jesus?" Video killed more than the radio star. It killed the video star. Has an absorption of pop culture into our churches led to a disappearance of the "Bright Morning Star?"

Tuesday, August 01, 2006

Bono on Worship

"What we've got to do in the music business is destroy the image that has got through … which has [given] God Almighty and Jesus Christ … an image of a weakling. A slightly effeminate image. A sort of Sunday image. A religious image. This is not the case. … This is something we're trying in U2 to do something about."

Bono, in a recently released 1981 presentation to a weekend retreat for Christian musicians with fellow band members the Edge and Larry Mullen Jr.
Christianity Today

HT: Josh Otte

Amy Wilhoite Cleared!

Check out Amy Wilhoite's blog today. She has been cleared. Her chemo got the leukemia! Rather, the Lord used the chemo to get the leukemia!

Of course, now the big battle is that she would remain disease-free until her immune system is back in speed.

Thanks be to God!!!

http://wilhoite.blogspot.com/2006/08/results.html